| Anonymous (ce-web2.wesleyan.edu) - 02.17.05 13:49:29 | | This is great, I really like it! |
|  |
| Max (ce-web2.wesleyan.edu) - 02.17.05 13:49:48 | | =max |
| |
| littledminor (dsl231-061-008.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net) - 08.05.05 18:27:25 | | Rothko wouldn't be so organic, don't you think? |
| |
| Tom 7 (h-72-244-70-115.phlapafg.dynamic.covad.net) - 08.07.05 01:48:05 | | No indeed. |
| |
| Baboon (mail.e-dologic.co.il) - 11.17.05 06:17:34 | | cool texture! |
| |
| Amy Mariaskin (cpe-069-134-209-153.nc.res.rr.com) - 01.15.06 12:41:03 | | This makes me miss the shit out of Pittsburgh. |
| |
| Lori Deemer (ip68-97-49-146.ok.ok.cox.net) - 02.18.06 20:50:06 | It's really beautiful! I love the texture in the photos of natural decay, and yes they wouldn't have the same romance in black and white. The seductive texture is also a part of Rothko's work when you get up close. If you are interested, check out my photos with some similar sensibilities.
http://www.lorideemer.com/gallery_photoart/photo-fineart.html |
| |
